Virginia Tech: Nutcase on Campus

Am I out of line in pointing out that college students are (except for the inane prohibition against legally buying beer) adults? If the students of Virginia Tech are anything like I was, they do not want, and resent, efforts of college administrators to coddle them like babies.Half of the eighteen year olds do not go off to college. Some go to fight and die in Iraq. Most just go out to live, work and boogey in their neighborhood, or some more exciting locale.
But, as we all knew would happen, there is much handwringing over the recent massacre. And the lawyers will not be far behind.
Instead of putting the blame squarely where it belongs, there are attempts to find fault with the college administration. Some are saying the kids should have been locked down after the first shooting. But much of the alarm concerns the failure of the college to do something about what they should have known Cho Seung-Hui might have done.
And the emphasis here is on "might." In America crackpots are legion. No one is ever able to predict what they "might" do.
It is entirely possible this guy might have been able to get a bit of a grip on himself and become a Noble Prize winning poet, or at least been a hit on the punk rock scene.
You just never know, and in America we do not lock up every person who is emo. And we can't imprison those who produce violent and macabre material. Hollywood would have no screenwriters.
The idea of the Gulag is quite un-American Thus the nutcases walk freely among us.
And if this kid had been a full-time employee of Micky D's, rather than a jerk off English major, would the citizens of Blacksburg have expected the town officials to provide them with special warning and protections? No, we all see the guys in tin foil hats. At most this reminds us it is a good idea to lock our doors at night. Sometimes we even keep a gun.
College is a place where young people, with sufficient ability, go to learn and interact. It is not an extension of nursery school. In fact, the purpose of a University is to foster exposure to all kinds of people and ideas. There is more of this at college, than back at the home burb, and that is what makes school cool.
There is a price to pay. These young people are going to be exposed to some bad stuff.
But it is no worse than, you or I, or the kids who did not go on to higher learning, must pay.
It never helps us cope to say that shit happens.
But, it does help prevent us from acting stupid.


Labels: Cho Seung-Hui, colleges, guns, insansity, killing, psychology, shooting, students, universities, Virgina Tech
































































7 Comments:
Truely a tragedy. The killer had such low self-esteem. Those in his life or crossing his path were ignorant or unconcerned, likely long before college. As long as we as a society as a whole allow just one person like this to live in hopeless insolation because of distraction, competition, or it's excused as a right of personal freedom, we continue risking repeating this sad outcome. No violent social behavior can be eliminated 100% but more can be done. It's natural to only feel anger and rage for such senseless acts and one cannot make excuses for this murderer. But one should see within the seething rage his motivation. Yes, it is cowardice, but it is also a desparate cry for help to those around him that missed the seriousness of his ill self-esteem and it's causes. Rather than solve flaws in security or try to irradicate criminal behavior with bigger law enforcement systems the horror begs a different question. The absolute belief in individual freedom,responsibility, and accountability by defalt neglectfully allows our fellow man to fail sometimes too gravely to our own peril. In our material capitalistic society this is the path we are on. How to change things socially in this country to continue personal choice with individual self success or failure without breeding such despondent ticking time bombs who feels they're losing everything should be the question. Is the sacrifice to forfeit some cherished wealth or social time to a stranger that high we will accept a random act of violence as bad karma or luck?Personal responsibility for the common healthiness of social and human relationship structures ends with what? The physcial boundaries of our homes, clergy, immediate family, our exclusive job performance rating, the judicial or education systems? I'm so sorry someone didn't recognise this "wounded" troubled man and provided help when his social wounds could be healed in childhood. To condem him posthumusly as nothing more than another villain "nut" is a lame excuse. His despare developed over a 23 year life span! My heart goes out to the families of the victims. This violence ripples out to scar so many lives but the danger lies in not seeing root causes in the act. Hatred at home or abroad is bred by more than immediate family experience. We all don' live in a vaccum. The only glimer of good that this may create is that this may cause some of us in society to feel motivated to share a tax dollar or two to offer more help with this problem and not just more prisons, and police. Social acceptance is a universal human need and the busyness of accumulating wealth and a focus on personal "fulfillment" seldom concerns itself with any mental or emotional despondancy in our neighbor. The degree of captialsim and charitable socialism woven into our country might address material needs but it seldom worries how social status effects human dignity unless their a potential customer of our own wealth accumulation. Two thousand years ago the Biblical begger on the side of the road faired better.
that was really eloquent and insightful jon.
why is the problem predominately an american one? why is it that in europe where gun laws are stricter the crime rates are lower? surely we could reduce the murder rate somewhat since guns produce more fatalities than other weapons?
i'm not so naive to think that the problem doesn't lie deeper..
-our john wayne mentality
-obsession with the superficial
-materialism
-stigma of mental illness.
my mind keeps going back to the amish and how their community dealt with this kind of horrific tragedy with forgiveness and by reaching out to the killer's family. i remember feeling so outraged when i heard about the murders and then being moved by the victims who brought a sense of hope for humanity.
Jon... that is incredibly well said.
With hearing all the seeking fault in the media the one aspect never mentioned is the character flaws of our own specied to shun odd balls and less-than-agreeable-to-our-liking people.
This young man who was capable of comitting such terrible acts just before he took his life was at one time a child entertaining thoughts of play time and treats.
Truly, there are no laws we could conceive of that could have changed the path he took.
Although, without even having to ask people to toss their religious (or lack of) beliefs, the 10 commandments probably would be a fair place to start for each individual within society as a whole.
I must disagree--jon expresses some noble theoretical sentiments, but let's talk about the practice:
Is the sacrifice to forfeit some cherished wealth or social time to a stranger that high we will accept a random act of violence as bad karma or luck?
In reality, there are tremendous numbers of people in our "materialistic" society giving time, money and talent every day to help those with all sorts of physical, material and psychological problems. But how much is enough? Jon seems to want to turn to more government, more programs, more taxes to try to prevent alienation. Unfortunately, it's not entirely preventable--it's a part of the human condition, at least until the government and drug makers force us all to take something to erase every bad memory and unhappy thought. Personally, I find that prospect much more horrifying than our current, imperfect condition.
Both Jon and Wahreit express noble sentiments. But, my head and a good part of my heart must be with Wahreit.
My head says that pouring more money and increasing the apparatus of government is not going to alleviate anything but the most basic problems of the human condition.
But both my heart and head cry out against attempts of society to overbearingly restrict the freedom of anyone to do as they wish, and that includes those we feel are mad.
Any system which in the guise of reaching out and helping those who are different than us, and "might" possibly be a threat, tramples on the individuality and right of these people to live their lives as these wish.
As a society, we do have an obligation to help those who may be a danger to themselves, and must do what we can to protect ourselves from those who might harm us. But, it must be very carefully tailored, and we must side on the risk of not doing enough. Otherwise, we will go back to the days when anyone who displayed a mental or emotional condition than was different than what society expects was locked up permanently and forced to endure cruel and ineffective treatments.
If the "Cuckoo Nest" is not enough to "help" these people and protect society we could always move a couple of steps over to the Stalinist Gulag.
I stand up for the right of those who are different than us to have the right to be different, and am willing to take the risk inherent in that sentiment. I honestly believe society would not be as rich without those most of us consider to be mad.
~Becky
I agree with you here. It is no one's "fault" that this happened. College is not an extension of Nursery School
low self esteem??
how about the jackass was a flaming narcissist who was totally incompetent socially?
saying he had low self esteem makes him the victim. i will never view him as a victim of any sort. this entire thing is his doing. it IS his FAULT.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home