Can Ron Paul Score in Indiana?

Besides being the birthplace of the hottest women in America's northern flyover zone, Indiana is known for basketball, and a libertarian streak—cheap cigarettes, retail Fourth of July fireworks and 191 proof vodka.
But like the rest of the rust belt, there is a strong feeling that if NAFTA was repealed and a Wall of Tariffs built around America, we would return to the 1960's, when manufacturing jobs were regularly putting two new cars into every suburban garage.
I don't know how this will play with the Democratic candidates, neither of which has a committed libertarian bone in their body, one of whom does not really believe his protectionist blather, and the other a convenient convert to economic nativism.
But it will be interesting to see if the Dean of the Red States, and homeland of Dan Quayle, will improve on Ron Paul's surprising showing in the Pennsylvania primary.
Although it was barely mentioned in the main stream media, Paul was able to get sixteen percent of the vote in the Pennsylvania primary. Why is this? Since Pennsylvania was a closed primary it may be indicative of a significant dissatisfaction among Republicans, which has nothing to do with McCain's unpopularity in fundie circles and his support of obscure campaign reform legislation.
Ron Paul is libertarian minded in most ways, but he is not a libertarian. He is a kinder and gentler Pat Buchanan, and they are both what the Republican Party was all about , especially in the Midwest, before World War II, and the ascendancy of monolithic communism made it impossible for the United States to hide behind two oceans, and let Main Street be--to hell with the rest of the world—whether it was the squabbling of Europeans or the teeming masses of Asia and Africa.
In this Andy Hardy world, everyone knew that Congress was a necessary evil, but we were glad they were way off in the little southern swamp known as Washington DC—and the only government we had much to do with was the local constabulary.
Ron Paul, would slash back the federal government to those idyllic times of the 1880's when there were no lead tainted Chinese imports, morphine was sold over the counter and sometimes the bank couldn't give you a loan until the old prospector returned from the hills with a bag of fresh gold.But seriously, Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate who understands, and has anything sensible to say about the economy. Unlike John McCain, who admittedly doesn't understand, and really doesn't care about economics, the dismal science has been Ron Paul's passion for decades.
He has long warned that the spendthrift practices of the federal government, along with the inflationary policies of the Fed , are creating great wealth on Wall Street, but taxing the people on Main Street right out of the middle class. Ron Paul was warning about this before CNN noticed that a trip to the supermarket was only marginally less unpleasant than pulling up to the pumps.
And about this war, that McCain is so fond of. Indiana has sacrificed a disproportionate number of their young men and women to the Mesopotamian conflagration. And most of those are the sons and daughters of old fashioned Republicans, many of whom are past wondering whether the troubles in that distant land has anything to do with their cherished freedoms, which they have noticed slipping away almost as fast as their economic prosperity.
This is a Republicanism that is quietly simmering in America's flyover zone, and one that is completely off the radar of modern Republican strategists-- drowned out by the voices of Limbaugh, Hannity and O'Reilly. And on the Left Coast, and in Manhattan, no one really cares what folks down on the Wabash have to say, once the election jocking is over.
The Republican Party is about more than the Cult of George Bush, neoconservatives and tedious promises to keep gays in their place. And the heady American Imperialism of McCain's hero Teddy Roosevelt, is just not the source of pride it once was.The Party, at its peril, takes the heartland for granted.


Labels: conservatives, Indiana, Indiana primary, Iraq War, isolationism, Libertarianism, NAFTA, Old Right, paleoconservatives, presidential campaign, Republican Party, Republicans, Ron Paul
































































7 Comments:
And speaking of Ron Paul...
Here's an article "Chaos over Paul cuts short gathering" http://www.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080427/NEWS/804270360/1321?1243567 that demonstrates how organization and activism can have an impact!
Nice post Becky. I hope to read more from your blog in the future.
The policy of corn to replace oil no matter it's present negative consequences will not be forgotten by those Hoosiers who have in interest in agribusiness in Indiana this year. Some of it's citizens understand what party butters their bread. And bread buttering forgives alot of ideological sins.
With "Agribusiness"/corporate welfare vs. family farms the "agribusiness" constituency would represent a shrinking base. And no decent red-blodded American want's our taxes subsidizing grain to an international market which includes Commies. In addition does anybody really think Huckabee (who dropped out of the race) received practically the same percentage of votes as RP??? In my state I had to cross party lines to vote for the Democrat/small farm/free enterprise candidate for Commissioner of ag.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Uaf1lyaqgSI
Barack Hussein Obama 's defeat in Pennsylvania was significant,
with Barack Hussein Obama losing
by wide margins in many parts of the state where he had dedicated much
time and resources. His strategists immediately began studying the
results — and intended to interview voters in a post-mortem — to see
what kept them from supporting Mr. Hussein Obama.
Obama was weakened — perhaps significantly — by his showing in
Pennsylvania. Campaign officials began reaching out to uncommitted
superdelegates and other party elders to prevent an erosion of
support, hoping to get ahead of Mrs. Clinton's efforts to persuade
leading Democrats to take a second look at Barack Hussein Obama's
candidacy.
Obama's campaign was left struggling to explain on Wednesday why he
had once again been unable to leave his opponent on the mat, as well
as his troubles gaining the backing of white working-class voters.
To take one example, only 60 percent of Democratic Catholic voters said they would vote for Barack Hussein Obama in a general election.
"Considering his financial advantage, the question ought to be, why can't he close the deal?" Mrs. Clinton said outside a polling place in a northern suburb of Philadelphia. "Why can't he win in a state like this?"
For at least two months, Barack Hussein Obama has struggled to close the deal on the nomination.
Shalom,
--- Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. ®
Distinguished Professor
http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
Oh poopy doopy--the blotto professor has stopped by to entertain and enlighten us.
~Becky
Becky,
Well said. We've drifted away from the long-standing American tradition of non-involvement in the affairs of other countries and it's literally killing us.
Dr. Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy was the hardest thing for this old soldier to come to terms with, but I'm finally convinced.
I only wish he'd specify that all the troops in Korea, Germany and Japan (and the other 130 countries where American troops are) would be coming home first. Then, some basic calm in Iraq (say a killing rate less than Chicago) and then we'd bring them home.
The US FDA just announced they were "going global" with many foreign offices. Gee, first the military, then the FBI and now the drug gestapo. What's next?
Cheers
"The road to empire is a bloody stupid waste." The Eagles.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home