San Francisco to Ban Cigarette Sales

The latest dispatch from the Nanny State is the proposed ban on the sale of cigarettes, and all other tobacco products, in San Francisco drug stores. It's enough to make me want to take up the filthy habit---except the last time tobacco touched my lips, I ended up sleeping with a man, and became a mom.I love San Francisco. It was home during my fag hag phase. Some of my best friends still live in the city. There is the bay, the bridge, the fog—and the fact that no one looks twice when a guy in a batman suit jumps aboard a bus.
But what has happened to Babylon by the Bay?
I'm afraid that a wonderful tolerance and celebration of debauchery has been replaced by the tyranny of the progressive babysitters—which has no tolerance for politically incorrect hedonism—whether it be cigarettes or second amendment sisters.
Its no better than the old days when the SFPD busted reefer mad beatniks in North Beach , or the time Governor Regan sent in the troops to evict San Francisco State students who “dressed like Tarzan, had hair like Jane and smelled like cheetah.”
Mayor Gavin Newsom is concerned that having tobacco in drug stores sends the wrong message—since these are places of healing. Apparently he has never noticed the twinkies (which not only, as we all know are turning us into unhealthy fatties, but were, according to a jury, responsible for the killing of SF Supervisor Harvey Milk) or all the unsafe and ineffective cold remedies, or the two aisles of flavored corn syrup and carbonated water—well actually he did—he has proposed a tax on sugary drinks.The worst thing is not that the ordinance will not cause one single person to quit smoking, nor that it will inconvenience a number of citizens.
Its not even that it will be a financial hardship for the small independent drug stores, that have to stock everything from money orders to femme butch porn, in order to scratch out a meager existence in today's world of Walgreen and CVS.
And while it is unspeakably offensive that Superstores like Wal-Mart and Costco, which only have a drug store department, will be exempt from the prohibition--that is not the worst thing.
The worst thing is the arrogance of it all--and the sad fact that a cabal of pathetic egos, who are the same people that lived to be student body leaders and hall monitors in high school, feel they have a moral obligation to force their subjects to behave themselves, even though they are not hurting anyone but themselves.
Tobacco is vile stuff. And if I smelled it on my kid's breath I would beat her to within an inch of her life. But thats just good parenting.
When did it become the obligation of the state to be our parent? Tobacco is a legal substance. Why should the San Francisco Board of Supervisors prohibit its sales in drug stores solely for the purpose of making sure that “the people” get the right message?Besides, do they really think there is a great deal of confusion about the health benefits of tobacco because it is sold at Rite Aid?
However this kind of thing is par for the course in San Francisco.
With plenty of time on their hands, and an exaggerated sense of importance, the leaders of San Francisco can not resist controlling every aspect of their subjects' lives.
It's not just smoking. There is the backyard dog ordinance—which dictates the type and size of water bowls which pet guardians must use, as well as the precise amount of kibble to be fed to Pooch. And there is the proposal to put a seventeen cent tax on shopping bags—whether they are plastic or paper—which like the hefty sin tax on cigarettes, will not achieve their noble social objective, and is just another gimmick to tax the poor in order to subsidize the white wine and brie elite.San Francisco demonstrates the universal truth that all Ideologies first become movements, then organizations, and finally they evolve into rackets.
The overpaid idealists of San Francisco can not understand why many of us find any of this offensive. And I admit, most of it is just mildly annoying, and good fodder for comedians.
But, it is also the type of thing that would make Stalin proud.
And the San Francisco Board of Supervisors are not unique—it's happening everywhere.
San Francisco is, just as it has always been, the trend setter.


Labels: cigarettes, drug stores, elitists, Gavin Newsom, leftists, libertarian, Nanny State, politically incorrect, progressives, San Francisco, San Francisco values, smoking, tobacco
































































14 Comments:
I was so shocked when I found out the several of the really conservative, prissy, sanctimoneous kids I went to high school with (including student body president) were living in San Francisco. At first I thought, "cool, these folks must have changed and become more mellow and tolerant in their oldish age." Then, sadly, I realized it was San Francisco that had changed L:o(
Good post. Kill them, kill them all.
This was in today's NY Times...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/business/13menthol.html?th=&adxnnl=1&emc=th&adxnnlx=1210694717-B9HgoMLCvLKTbS/21iWTPw
Hear, hear! You're saying things that need to be said! Good work!
Well said!
Well intended tyranny is still tyranny.
Love your blog...so much I blogged about it today: http://actionbobmarkle.blogspot.com/2008/05/just-girl-in-short-shorts-talking-about.html
Dave, the thing that struck me about the article you cited is that Congress is seriously considering taking decisive action and eliminating menthol in cigarettes, which t there is no evidence causes any harm--though a government scientist said it might, possibly, perhaps is harmful in some unspecified, unknown way (and some other people, of no particular expertise, suggested it just had to be)--when there are an abundance of things which are indisputably causing a great deal of harm in the county, such as the economy, and there is no talk of decisive action--but plenty of talk.
And Pat, I betcha those straight arrow fellows you mentioned were gay all along:)
~Becky
I'd beat my kids for smoking too, if i had any. Anyone care to loan me theirs?
;)
Hey Becky,
As soon as the government stops subsidizing tobacco growers, I'll agree with you. In the meantime, ban away.
PS: No over-zealous city council and mayor could ever reduce my love for SF. It's one of the great cities of the world. It's so beautiful it takes my breath away every time every time I go there, even though I grew up seeing it often.
Kate, I'll do you one better--stop all corporate welfare, including farming (tobacco) subsidies. It causes no end to problems. The ethanol subsidy is now one of the big causes of the price of food here--and people starving in foreign countries.
~Becky
Wouldn't it make more LOGICAL sense that the ONLY place you could buy an addictive drug would be... a pharmacy? Sheesh...
SF is bizzaro world. I can say that because all my life I have lived near it.
When I was a teen we would ditch school and run up to the City. Carol Doda (and her ilk) in North Beach was where it was at.
In those days people would walk up to you on the street and offer to sell you hash even if you did look like a kid.
It's a city where young adults move to, experience and then move away from. It's not really a friendly place. It's quite possibly home to the most self centered populous anywhere.
I've never been able to put my finger on it but you helped me with the wannabe hall monitor observation concerning the city gov.
As far as banning tobacco it seems stupid. It sounds like something you might expect in a strict Muslim country.
To think these opposites share something in common, repressing freedom of choice confirms by bizzaro world discription.
Mike
Firefighter Blog
It’s interesting to see that even a boring topic like medicine can capture such media space and have so many words devoted to it. To quote an instance we can mention chantix. Its one of those drugs that almost represents the whole concept of the quit smoking drugs, or rather publicity has made it that. Irrespective of the fact how chantix works or how effective it is it has managed to gain a fair amount of attention and make way to the people’s homes. Thanks to publicity or rather publicity agenda superstardom for a drug was an unthought of concept a few years back. http://www.chantixhome.com/
Do you know Rose zuly? I like it.
My brother often go to the internet bar to buy rose zulie and play it.
After school, He likes playing games using these rose online zuly with his friend.
I do not like to play it. Because I think that it not only costs much money but also spend much time. One day, he give me many rose online zulieand play the game with me.
I came to the bar following him and found Arua ROSE zulywas so cheap. After that, I also go to play game with him.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home