Sunday, July 06, 2008

Google Out Evils Viacom

evil google


a2 All those who are assailing Viacom, and the federal judge who ordered the release of 12 terabytes of data on the viewing habits of approximately 100 million users of YouTube (including IP address, login, usernames, videos watched), never point a middle finger at the real villain.

google Yeah, Viacom may be an asshole corporation, and the judge may be an ignorant toady, but the giant corporation which made the whole thing possible is Google.

Google collects personal information for two reasons. One is legitimate, and one ideological.

Legitimately they keep track of our search habits, YouTube viewing patterns, and scan gmail content, so they can shoot targeted ads our way. While that is kinda disturbing, it is legitimate.

Larry Page and Sergey Brin Ideologically, Google makes no secret of their goal of collecting every fact about every single person and thing in the Universe. Larry and Sergey want a map of your soul on their servers. They call it profiling, and say the idea is to give us better search results—the results are fine tuned beyond what we even consciously realize is the type of information we are looking for.

eric schmidt Eric Schmidt has stated that ultimately their goal is to enable Google users to be able to ask questions such as "What shall I do tomorrow?’ and ‘What job shall I take?’”

1984 How creepy that an organization would want to know so much about us that they could actually map our life for us—tell us not only what jobs to take, but what to do in our spare time or even what religion would be best for us.

But it gets worse. I don't want to sound like I am sporting a tin foil hat, so I will just repeat Larry Page's own words:

"On the more exciting front, you can imagine your brain being augmented by Google. For example you think about something and your cell phone could whisper the answer into your ear."

Google Gulag Google envisions a future where our brains will have some kind of Google implant. I don't know whether this will be an opt in/opt out feature.

google Most people don't seem too concerned about this—Google is good people,and ushering in the New Age. Since they “do no evil”apparently we are willing to entrust our very souls and being to them.

For the sake of argument I am willing to assume that Google's intentions are truly noble, and they seek only the uplifting of the human race, and Planet Earth generally.

But, do people really believe that Google is going to be able to keep that type of information under wraps for an eternity?

Do they even try?

Google sends their lawyers, who make some perfunctory objections to the requests for release of personal information, and they get heaps of praise from privacy activists.

Girls in Chains But, if they really cared they would refuse to hand it over, and then go into massive delete mode. Yeah, they'd be in contempt—and might have to pay a few million dollars in fines, and perhaps someone would go to jail—but that is the kind of thing that sincere civil libertarians do.

Better yet, they should stop the collection of personal information.

This information is eventually going to get in the hands of people a lot worse than Viacom.

green google Google, being ever so eco-friendly, would take umbrage at the suggestion they are worse than the nuclear power industry. But that industry only creates radioactive byproducts, with million year half lives, because it is unavoidable.

radioactive  waste Collecting radioactive personal data is not that type of thing. Perhaps Google can give slightly better search results because of their corporate invasion of our privacy, and perhaps they do increase the profit margin on advertising.

But for a company that prides itself on not doing evil, these pluses do not even begin to counterbalance the negative consequences. It is not essential for the work they do. They do not have to do this in order to be profitable.

Google Gulag However, Google has modified the don't be evil mission statement. After they chose to cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party thugs in censoring the Chinese people, Eric Schmidt said “We actually did an evil scale and decided not to serve at all was worse evil.”

So the mantra is now sort of an evil minimization algorithm, utilizing the theorems of evil relativity.

I don't know how that algorithm works, but being a simple girl, I tend to think if Google was truly our friend, they would be spending the weekend destroying all of the personal data they have collected, and never gather another byte.

But it will be a snowy day in Mountain View when that happens.

a1Becky's Stuff

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

11 Comments:

Blogger GeorgeH said...

Even if Google is good people, who can really believe they always will be?
As the founders begin to retire, there will be a Steve Ballmer clone in charge. After him perhaps, a Nixon clone or even a Goebbels clone if the chairman is chosen from the marketing department instead of the legal department.

Change usernames often.

8:51 AM  
Blogger Charlie on the PA Turnpike said...

Putting aside the legitimate privacy concerns and ideological issues about Google's practices, from a purely fiscal point of view it would have been much cheaper/profitable for Google to have purchased Viacom instead of YouTube!

11:03 AM  
Anonymous James said...

Becky,

Very informative post. Remember back when you could type a phone number into google and Google Maps would show up with directions to the house the number was registered to?

It's amazing how much data a simple search engine can collect and what they can do with it. But it scares me that we live in a world where the entertainment industry is able to demand any website turn over it's user info.

James
blog.jvf.com

12:35 PM  
Blogger HEK said...

Knowledge is power, and since Google demands absolute knowledge, they are, by corollary, seeking absolute power over knowledge. And we all know how well absolute power turns out.

I used to think that Google was oue millennial epoch's desparate undertaking to get all human endeavor under one roof, so to speak, much like Rennaissance scholars or 18th century encyclopediast Diderot or lexicographer Samuel Johnson.

I've found their assay of books useful--some downright obscure and rare volumes have been taken up into the Google maw and made accessible to me without me having to leave my chair. Which is, well, amazing. And it makes me anxious. Something so...total and invasive cannot last. It doesn't seem real, somehow. But maybe I'm a phogey.

Unlike the ancient Library at Alexandria, however, that amassed that world's learning on scrolls, Google is turning into a kind of Akashic Library--which is fine if we're talking metaphysics and the collective subconscious, not collecting my consciousness to be pervayed like a menu.

I'm reminded, too, of the Borges "Library of Bable" which has every possible combination of book.

"The universe (which others call the Library) is composed of an indefinite and perhaps infinite number of hexagonal galleries....

When it was proclaimed that the Library contained all books, the first impression was one of extravagant happiness. All men felt themselves to be the masters of an intact and secret treasure. There was no personal or world problem whose eloquent solution did not exist in some hexagon. The universe was justified, the universe suddenly usurped the unlimited dimensions of hope."

Google--should the species survive, or at least, maintain the energy sources to keep the electricity flowoing--could evolve into some kind of...well, alternate reality. Talk about the Sims and Second Life -- talk about tin foil hat territory...

But since, everything eventually leads to Star Trek (Classic, not the dubious franchise imitators), there was an episode "All Our Yesterdays." In it, the librarian Mr. Atoz. Mr. Atoz administrates over a vast collection of what looks like DVDs. He is sending inhabitants of a planet doomed to be destroyed through a time machine called an Avatachron. You slap in a DVD of a favorite time period and POOF you go there.

In a rudimentary way, Google is already giving people endless doorways into different perspectives -- and levels of commerce. But maybe this is just the beginning, and one day, Google will be Everything, like the Earth computer in "A Hitchiker's Guide."

Thanks, Becky.

1:18 PM  
Blogger Will said...

Me?

I'm gonna quote an earlier TV show - "The Twilight Zone" - where a future society viewed everyone who didn't conform as "obsolete".

(If you remember the episode, it was a cautionary-tale against letting the Powers that Be get too powerful -- they knew everything about a person, and as the Man in Question was a 'librarian', he had no value).

But what do I know.

Here's a wake-up call: Google is ALREADY evil - if 'evil' is defined as 'making it easier on the Powers that Be by collecting all this damn info.'

Einstein once said that our humanity had been overcome by our technology (or words to that effect) -- no one is bothering to say 'why?'; all they're saying is 'Look! How cool! "They" can do "that"!'

1:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good article....only thing I disagree with is your stating "being a simple girl". Dont be so modest. Far from it, you are one of the most complex blog girls on the internet.

5:08 PM  
Blogger Yorel E said...

great post!!! thanks! part of the problem, from whatever perspective pro or con of any consolidation of knowledge and information is that there has to be editing done. meaning, someone (algorithm, web-developer-weenie, cfo/cio/ceo)has to decide how to put the raw data into information which is associated with the end user (whether they ask for an association or not.) what's relevant and what's not? that's a very small step from creating 'information' in order to manipulate the end user. history is written by the winners, they say. in the future, perhaps, 'reality' will be written by the most cost-effective solution to the question the info owners want you to ask.

7:10 PM  
Blogger Charlie on the PA Turnpike said...

Remember back when you could type a phone number into google and Google Maps would show up with directions to the house the number was registered to?

With all due respect, I warned single women about www.anywho.com 8-10 years ago, which offered a reverse phone number look-up, maps to the address, and the names and phone numbers of the NEIGHBORS on the same block. anywho.com was owned/operated by AT&T (and still is), so while this is in no way a pass for Google's excess, they weren't the originator of the over-the-top information.

7:27 PM  
Anonymous Adam Moro said...

Another great article, Becky! What gets me though is how a lot of people overlook the fact that Yahoo and MSN also collect personal information.

5:29 PM  
Blogger cbmilne33 said...

Point taken over the fact that the internet companies do gather user data.One step that Google could combat this is to create an interlocking user base including Blogger,Orkut,Picasa,Youtube,Gmail,etc so that there would be an integrated Google user base several million strong to take on those who may do evil vs themselves etc.

11:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you know Rom Gold? I like it.
My brother often go to the internet bar to buy Runes of Magic Gold and play it.
After school, He likes playing games using these Runes of Magic money with his friends.
I do not like to play it. Because I think that it not only costs much money but also spend much time. One day, he give me many buy Rom Goldand play the game with me.
I came to the bar following him and found cheap Runes of Magic Goldwas so cheap. After that, I also go to play game with him.

10:18 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home