Recession Not a Repudiation of Capitalism

I am just a little tired of all the pundits (and my rif raf friends) telling me how the tanking of the economy is a repudiation of free markets, libertarian economics and capitalism.
I will even stipulate that the recession was caused by evil hedge fund managers, greedy bankers and unscrupulous mortgage originators and dealers—who were totally unregulated and in cahoots with the Republican Party.Without minimizing the true, and often severe, pain many folks are now suffering, I do not feel bad in telling the liberal and leftist nannies who are wringing their hands over this, to just shut up—and please don't make things worse.
Do you actually believe if Fidel Castro had been at the helm of the Republic, for the past forty years, the life of Americans would be so much more bountiful---and of course, equitable?
According to the Census Bureau, income per capita adjusted for inflation has doubled in the four decades since 1968, from $13,374 to $26,804. Non-wage compensation, in the form of employee benefits, has also increased greatly during that time.
Thanks to this new prosperity, and the growth of places like Wal-Mart, items that were considered luxuries just a few years ago, are now common throughout the economic and social strata.
Richard Alm, the senior vice president and chief economist and the senior economics writer at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, reported that in 2005 a full 85 percent of households that are classified as poor by the Census Bureau have air conditioning (compared to only 36 percent in 1971); 97 percent have a color television (compared to 40 percent in 1971); 40 percent have an automatic dishwasher (as opposed to 20 percent in 1971); and almost 100 percent own a refrigerator (a 25 percent increase over 1970).
I am the first to argue, and do so frequently, that the primary problem with the economy is that we have become addicted to debt, greed and gluttonous consumption---along with an aversion to productive work--from the top of the social and political ladder to the bottom. And this is largely the cause of our current economic woes—which are serious.But, it is not a failure of capitalism, or free markets—it was precisely these systems which gave us the prosperity we obtained (and still largely enjoy) and the ability to get into this particular mess—a problem which the economic planners in the Soviet Union, China and Cuba never had to worry about.
Both Karl Marx and Milton Friedman agree that a capitalist system will go through these cycles. But the alternative----a government that is so wise it can plan and regulate the economy down to the last detail, is an economy that lacks these dips—but is also consistently miserable.
Of course, no one likes these natural recessions---and so politicians always try to come up with something that will prevent it or bring us quickly out of a downswing. This usually involves debasing the currency with low interest rates, the printing of money, and heavy government expenditures---and of course a few people go to jail and the government comes up with more regulation.
This did not work in the New Deal,and it will not work now. Though it may be delayed, the problem and pain is intensified.It's alright to whine about the economy.
But, just don't point your finger at the very things that created the prosperity, which makes the economic downturn even noticeable to you.


Labels: capitalism, Communism, economic regulation, economics, economy, free markets, laissez faire, Libertarianism, Politics, recession, socialism, statism
































































7 Comments:
You're brilliant. I would also add...You can't blame capitalism, when we haven't been living in a capitalist society. We live in a fascist/socialist society. Capitalism did not cause the Great Depression, Fascism (The Fed) did. Likewise, Capitalism is not causing our current depression, government involvement in business is causing these problems.
Greed and gluttonous behavior are fine, as long as their effects are not forced on the rest of us through fascist relationships between business and government.
"Progressives... everything must be made perfect for them." (said by an Intourist guide about a bunch of American communists touring the USSR, as quoted in PJ O'Rourke's piece "Ship of Fools").
Heaven forbid that we ever suffer the slightest discomfort without government intervention.
Of course government is grasping for yet more power. Why shouldn't it?
Modern citizens do not regard government as a necessary evil to be contained as harshly as possible. They certainly do not think that government could ever be a real evil.
No, in modern thought, big government is a panacea, able to address and cure all ills of every kind. This social snake-oil is insidious. It penetrates all segments of society and oozes into every crevice. It cannot be stopped. Recent experience shows that it can hardly even be discredited. Massive abuses over the past eight years (and more historically - I'm an even-handed curmudgeon) have been ignored and passed over until the new "change" guy gets a shot at it. The only candidate who suggested real, systemic change was laughed off of the ballots.
So, of course government opportunists will seize on the chance to blame everyone other than themselves as they make smooth, sweet promises that all will be well if the public just lets them seize one more chunk of freedom, tie it up and sink it in the Bureaucracy Bijou.
Personally, I'd have voted with my feet a long time ago if that was possible. Unfortunately, creeping socialism seems to have won everywhere.
Teacher what a mess, how can we clean this up? Moderation comes to mind, when I push the accelerator to save on gas. Why can't it be simple as that, I ask myself. There are people that thrive on the complicated complexities and get no where close to what they want to achieve.
You show me a lot here, thank you from the heart.
I agree, as I've quoted this stolen old cliche before, "Live by the sword, die by the sword", [economically speaking]
In my opinion, the benefit of market dynamics do not come from free markets, because free markets are inherently unstable. THay's why most monoplies are illegal. When people speak of "free markets" they are really referring to fair markets, and understanding the role of regulation in the operation of fair markets goes a long way toward understanding the proper role of government in the economy. I'm having this very conversation with myself at z9z99.blogspot.com.
Do you know buy lindens? I like it.
My brother often go to the internet bar to buy second life linden and play it.
After school, He likes playing games using these cheap linden with his friends.
I do not like to play it. Because I think that it not only costs much money but also spend much time. One day, he give me many linden dollars and play the game with me.
I came to the bar following him and found secondlife money was so cheap. After that, I also go to play game with him.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home